|
soren121
|
 |
« on: September 15, 2008, 04:09:46 AM » |
|
Anyone got a good recommendation for a easy-to-use, but powerful video editor, preferably suited for movies. Windows Movie Maker is OK, but it is SEVERELY limited, and has so few features. Sony Vegas is way too complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
InternetHero
Dualbooter - Ubuntu & Vista
Hyper-Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 264
...I like to consider myself clever!
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2008, 04:23:28 AM » |
|
You can try Adobe Premiere or Adobe After Effects but they're much harder than to learn and master. Sony Vegas is as simple and professional as they come. But if you insist on not using Vegas then you might wanna try Sony Movie Studio (or whatever it's called..)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
banancanard
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2008, 04:30:18 AM » |
|
You can try PowerDirector by CyberLink. Its quite simple to use and has a lot of different features to use.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Programming is 10% science, 20% ingenuity, and 70% getting the ingenuity to work with the science.
|
|
|
mm3guy
Member
Offline
Posts: 39
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2008, 04:40:19 AM » |
|
A nice feature-filled newbie-friendly video editor I know of is ULead VideoStudio. It doesn't compare to Adobe Premiere, which is the best video editor I've ever used, but it's a nice starting point before you move up. Since the last time I used it, it's been bought by Corel, but here's a link to it: http://www.corel.com/servlet/Satellite/us/en/Product/1175714228541#versionTabview=tab0&tabview=tab0@InternetHero: After Effect isn't a true video editor, it's designed to essentially do special effects, but is not really designed to act like a video editor, that's why Adobe has premiere.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
soren121
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2008, 04:44:27 AM » |
|
@InternetHero: Great suggestion, I'm downloading the Vegas Movie Studio Platinum trial right now!
@banancanard: Thanks, I'll try that if I don't like Vegas.
@mm3guy: I actually have ULead VideoStudio 4 SE. And it's from 1997. Maybe I'll try out a newer version sometime.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
manicgames
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2008, 04:53:57 AM » |
|
I use Vegas 8, it's relatively easy. I also use Adobe After Effects, which is not the least user friendly. There is also Pinnacle Studio which is easy, but like Windows Movie Maker, it pretty much has the same crap in everyone's movies who uses it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mm3guy
Member
Offline
Posts: 39
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2008, 05:15:29 AM » |
|
@mm3guy: I actually have ULead VideoStudio 4 SE. And it's from 1997. Maybe I'll try out a newer version sometime.
Well, it's had many changes in 11 years 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ultimatebuster
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2008, 11:33:48 AM » |
|
C'mon, get opensource
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
soren121
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2008, 08:28:06 PM » |
|
C'mon, get opensource
I tried. There isn't a decent EASY-TO-USE open-source video editor out there. LiVES and Cinerama are for professionals who got a degree. That does not include me. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
manicgames
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2008, 08:31:34 PM » |
|
Opensource is good, but people must remember that not everything is opensource.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
advanced-scape
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2008, 09:21:15 PM » |
|
hmm yea i use windows movie maker
its ok but im sure theres alot better programs out there which are free
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|