|
meep-online
|
 |
« Reply #180 on: July 13, 2008, 10:06:33 AM » |
|
Indeed. The problem with hashes is that information stored in them is unrecoverable by definition ;p
However, I don't see why we absolutely have to hang onto the actual password; I think we should gradually migrate to a hash-only system. I'm implementing a security challenge-response based password-resetting mechanism.
The new GUI is shaping up quite nicely, in case you're wondering. I hope to have a more complete demo system up soon.
Thats cool. I actually think that your system could go quite far. Well, at least it has the potential to. Good luck  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
robinelden
Member
 Offline
Posts: 6
|
|
« Reply #181 on: August 24, 2008, 09:08:00 PM » |
|
Sounds good - Invite Please!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ThiNu
Member
Offline
Posts: 1
|
|
« Reply #182 on: August 25, 2008, 08:42:46 PM » |
|
Is anyone willing to help test this system? I'm ready to dish out private testing invitations  I am interested in helping you test. Your system sounds very interesting. Can you send me an invitation? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
beautytips
|
|
« Reply #183 on: August 27, 2008, 10:09:30 AM » |
|
count me also
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
antimatter15
|
|
« Reply #184 on: November 09, 2009, 03:00:40 AM » |
|
(Yes, this topic is almost 2 years old)
I just want to note the striking similarity between this and Google Wave (and how this preempted the release of Wave).
They both aim to solve the issue of spam by providing better identification of the sender. They're both "hosted conversations" where each conversation is identified by a URI (in Wave, its a Wave ID). The communication isn't directly tied to any server, hence basically "federated". Both rely on cryptographic routines to ensure the identity of members of the conversation.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ajax Animator, a web-based, collaborative animation authoring environment with Flash, Silverlight, and GIF export.
|
|
|
inp o҉rtb
The Gangsta
Global Moderator
Official 110mb Guru
Offline
Posts: 15624
experimental theologian
|
|
« Reply #185 on: November 09, 2009, 03:51:33 AM » |
|
And, there's this private sandbox-style development thing. Well, it was worth a try  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
antimatter15
|
|
« Reply #186 on: November 09, 2009, 07:05:15 AM » |
|
Since I can't see anythign new from it, are you considering putting the source somewhere so it could possibly be useful to someone?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ajax Animator, a web-based, collaborative animation authoring environment with Flash, Silverlight, and GIF export.
|
|
|
inp o҉rtb
The Gangsta
Global Moderator
Official 110mb Guru
Offline
Posts: 15624
experimental theologian
|
|
« Reply #187 on: November 09, 2009, 09:43:30 AM » |
|
But shouldn't we be hopping on the Wave bandwagon?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
antimatter15
|
|
« Reply #188 on: November 10, 2009, 05:28:03 AM » |
|
Well, someone could adapt your interface to use as a wave client
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ajax Animator, a web-based, collaborative animation authoring environment with Flash, Silverlight, and GIF export.
|
|
|
inp o҉rtb
The Gangsta
Global Moderator
Official 110mb Guru
Offline
Posts: 15624
experimental theologian
|
|
« Reply #189 on: November 10, 2009, 05:40:29 AM » |
|
... and the interface is right there for the downloading. Everything is on a single page (with supporting scripts linked in as dependencies), and what you see is what you get; I don't have any other versions of code...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
meep-online
|
|
« Reply #190 on: November 10, 2009, 06:35:37 AM » |
|
You don't have backend?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
antimatter15
|
|
« Reply #191 on: November 11, 2009, 11:49:42 AM » |
|
Well, why don't you want to release the server?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ajax Animator, a web-based, collaborative animation authoring environment with Flash, Silverlight, and GIF export.
|
|
|
inp o҉rtb
The Gangsta
Global Moderator
Official 110mb Guru
Offline
Posts: 15624
experimental theologian
|
|
« Reply #192 on: November 11, 2009, 12:32:15 PM » |
|
because that would entail actually documenting my code  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
antimatter15
|
|
« Reply #193 on: November 12, 2009, 11:44:30 AM » |
|
Well, i never document my code and it goes public anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ajax Animator, a web-based, collaborative animation authoring environment with Flash, Silverlight, and GIF export.
|
|
|
inp o҉rtb
The Gangsta
Global Moderator
Official 110mb Guru
Offline
Posts: 15624
experimental theologian
|
|
« Reply #194 on: November 12, 2009, 02:40:36 PM » |
|
See, I usually don't comment my code either, so the whole meaning's lost on me after a year or two; what good would it be to anyone else, practically?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
antimatter15
|
|
« Reply #195 on: November 15, 2009, 07:54:33 AM » |
|
A future super AI could use it to try improving itself
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ajax Animator, a web-based, collaborative animation authoring environment with Flash, Silverlight, and GIF export.
|
|
|
inp o҉rtb
The Gangsta
Global Moderator
Official 110mb Guru
Offline
Posts: 15624
experimental theologian
|
|
« Reply #196 on: November 16, 2009, 01:46:26 AM » |
|
Hm... now that's something. I wonder why Skynet would not slurp waves instead...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Richard F
|
|
« Reply #197 on: November 17, 2009, 06:04:43 AM » |
|
this looks really interesting. Invite, please, if there are still some?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
antimatter15
|
|
« Reply #198 on: November 17, 2009, 12:56:16 PM » |
|
Because skynet needs something to build up to the real wave. You can't (even if you're a baby skynet) jump straight from nothing to super-real-timeness with soaring communication-ness.
Also, I want to make a network based on having lasers reflect off the clouds and others recieving by focusing a lens at that point in the sky and decoding the data. Then I woudl name the project "skynet"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ajax Animator, a web-based, collaborative animation authoring environment with Flash, Silverlight, and GIF export.
|
|
|
inp o҉rtb
The Gangsta
Global Moderator
Official 110mb Guru
Offline
Posts: 15624
experimental theologian
|
|
« Reply #199 on: November 17, 2009, 01:04:56 PM » |
|
Hm... that would be incredibly difficult using lasers. You'd prolly find it easier to use noncoherent radiation.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
